Sayyed al-Houthi assures armistice is temporary, their moves indicate preps for escalation

During a meeting with the dignitaries of Dhamar Governorate, the Leader of the Revolution, Sayyed Abdul Malik Badreddine al-Houthi, presented a final and main assessment of all the moves taken by the US-Saudi-Emirati aggressive coalition and the United Nations under the title of “peace” and “truce,” including the armistice that ended yesterday.

He stressed that all these moves are of a “temporary” nature and do not involve any real desire for sustainable peace in Yemen, but rather come as a way to arrange for their new plans. Sayyed al-Houthi made it clear that the paths to deter and discipline the aggression are inevitable, and that everything it seeks to gain through temporary lulls will be foiled because their plans are already exposed and there is a predisposition to thwart them.

The Leader of the Revolution’s assessment of the nature of the enemy’s movements is proved by the behavior of the coalition of aggression with regard to the peace file. For years, the countries of aggression have not yet shown any real desire to end the conflict, which was clearly crystallized also during the ended armistice.

Even though, the response of Sanaa to these movements, despite the clarity of their purpose, shows that it possesses extensive and comprehensive political and military information that allows it to transform the enemy’s “evasions” into opportunities to alleviate the suffering of citizens and to expose the reality of the aggressors’ use of the humanitarian file as a bargaining tool and to gain time within their plans that ultimately collide with the vigilance of the Yemeni people.

“The enemies continue to target the country at all levels and continue their military arrangements; With the aim of an escalation in the coming stages,” Sayyed al-Houthi noted, adding: “They are arranging for economic, political and comprehensive conspiracies.”

The enemy, through its plans, trying to restrict the options of Sanaa and disrupt its vision through “armistice” is a completely unsuccessful endeavor, which prejudges the failure of the arrangements prepared by the aggression. This is because the course of the confrontation has demonstrated over the past years that Sana’a was distinguished by anticipating the plots of its enemies and its ability to turn those plots into counter-strikes. It also proved that the failure of the coalition of aggression in the field of confrontation needs much more than just “gaining time.”

In this context, the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Salvation Government, Hussein Al-Ezzi, commented on the mercenaries’ announcement of “raising the combat readiness,” saying: “There is no harm in that, but they should hold their breath when they commit the first foolishness.”

“I do not want to pre-empt events with any talk, but what they reject from us today, they will look for it tomorrow,” he added.

A clear political-military message that Sanaa confirms, based on its accurate reading of the nature of the enemy’s movements, is that it has prepared to transform any aggressive step into a new predicament for the enemy, a predicament that Sana’a also knows that the enemy will not find a way out of except by returning to what it puts on the table, just as it did when they resorted to the armistice to escape the dilemma of the military “breaking the siege” operations that targeted the depth of the aggressive countries.