Ansarollah Website Official Report

Published: Safar 25, 1447 AH


Before the UN General Assembly, Criminal Benjamin Netanyahu invoked what he called his “Talmudic heritage” to justify expansionist ambitions threatening the region and undermining both regional and global peace. There, the war criminal displayed a map of what he termed “Greater Israel,” vowing to overcome the so-called “80-year curse” and lead his illegal entity into its “centennial era.”

Just last week, as global opposition to his remarks about reoccupying Gaza had not yet subsided, Netanyahu once again set off alarm bells by promoting what he described as the “vision of Greater Israel.” This was seen as his direct response to mounting criticism.

Netanyahu and his extremist circle wasted no time. In the midst of what observers describe as a climate of bullying and chaos, they move systematically to impose a new reality, dismissing global condemnations as meaningless. While international voices accused him of violating international law and the UN Charter, Netanyahu openly revealed long-laid plans, with little regard for the statements and denunciations from world leaders, organizations, and prominent figures.

 


Arab Concerns Over Escalation

 

Netanyahu’s blunt disregard was widely covered across media and social platforms, exposing the impotence of those who have long pandered to Israel and the United States. According to the Palestinian Information Center, his remarks amounted to a direct threat to Arab nations and a slap in the face to advocates of normalization, as well as to those urging disarmament of the resistance. Critics asked: “Do you need clearer proof? Israel is openly declaring its project—will silence remain the response?”

Abdul-malik al-Houthi, leader of Yemen’s Ansar Allah movement, has repeatedly warned that the Israeli enemy—backed by the United States—seeks to impose a framework of domination and plunder across Arab and Muslim lands. Unless Arabs and Muslims take action to stop what he described as “Zionist barbarism,” the danger will engulf everyone.

Yet, Arab official responses have largely stopped at describing Netanyahu’s rhetoric as “provocative escalation,” “a threat to sovereignty,” and “a violation of international law and the UN Charter.” Critics argue that such words will do nothing to halt the Israeli entity’s actions. Calls for the international community to “move immediately” are seen as inadequate—real defense, they insist, must come from within the Arab and Muslim nations themselves.

 


Expansionist Ideology and Distorted Biblical Claims

 

The so-called vision of “Greater Israel” envisions swallowing eight Arab countries—or parts of them—under the guise of a divine right rooted in distorted biblical beliefs. Zionist leaders have carried this ideology for over 120 years, as this plan is not new.

In 2016, Bezalel Smotrich—then a member of the "Knesset" and now the Zionist entity’s "finance minister"—revived this agenda, claiming the entity’s borders should extend to Damascus and encompass Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, part of Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, fulfilling the “Zionist dream from the Nile to the Euphrates.” He reiterated this position again in March 2023. Netanyahu’s recent map went further, even including Kuwait.

The territories outlined in his “Greater Israel” map include: all of historic Palestine (27,027 sq. km), Lebanon (10,452 sq. km), Jordan (89,213 sq. km), more than 70% of Syria, half of Iraq, nearly a third of Saudi Arabia, a quarter of Egypt, and part of Kuwait.

 


New Settlement Push in the West Bank

 

Last Thursday, Smotrich announced the launch of a massive settlement program in the E1 area, aimed at linking the Ma’ale Adumim settlement with al-Quds, effectively severing East Quds from the West Bank. He openly declared that the West Bank is “part of Israel by divine promise,” announcing plans to confiscate thousands of dunams of land, invest billions, and bring in one million settlers.

The head of Ma’ale Adumim’s settlement council said the project would “eliminate the dream of a Palestinian state” and stressed the need to “ignore international criticism” until full Israeli sovereignty is imposed over the West Bank.

Zionist newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported that the plan includes 3,401 new settlement units near Ma’ale Adumim and 3,515 more in surrounding areas—an unmistakable step toward annexation.

Foreign ministers of 31 countries condemned the move as a flagrant violation of international law and UN Security Council Resolution 2334, warning against the Israeli entity’s policies targeting Palestinian lands and holy sites, particularly Al-Aqsa Mosque. Resolution 2334 explicitly denounces all settlement activities altering the demographic, legal, or geographic status of the occupied Palestinian territories since 1967.

 


The Threat of Regional Displacement

 

Analysts warn that Arab inaction risks surrendering to the Zionist entity’s expansionist agenda, which could erase countries and populations from the map. Displacement, they argue, would not be confined to Gaza but extend to citizens of all countries the entity seeks to absorb into its “new Middle East.”

Former Egyptian Deputy Foreign Minister Ambassador Hussein Haridi stressed that Arab states—especially those with normalization agreements—must adopt firm positions befitting their national responsibilities. Failure to do so, he warned, will leave people of the region to pay the price, as the Zionist enemy aims to seize not only Gaza and the West Bank, but also Jordan, parts of Egypt, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia.

Oman’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Ahmad al-Khalili likewise warned those allied with the Zionist enemy that “there is no salvation except by holding to the truth, unity, and supporting the resistance they once abandoned.”

 


Resistance as the Last Line of Defense

 

Observers note that the Zionist entity, emboldened by Western and American backing, views neighboring Arab states as subordinate and disposable. The reality, they argue, is that Palestinian resistance remains the only true safeguard against these ambitions. Reliance on diplomacy and political maneuvering, absent real pressure on Israel and its allies, will leave no nation safe from its aggression.