Ansarollah Website Official Report

Published: Safar 29, 1447 AH

When the well-known Zionist newspaper Globes revealed last Monday the realities of the confrontation between Yemen and the Zionist entity, it acknowledged clearly—without embellishment—that “Yemen is achieving superiority in the equation of deterrence despite its limited capabilities.” The paper admitted that Yemen succeeded in achieving a strategic breakthrough that shifted the balance of confrontation, proving that the barbarism of the Zionist entity in its aggressive conduct is in fact, a sign of weakness, and perhaps the only tool it knows to hide behind.

This, observers note, exposes the enemy’s fabricated narrative that it is repelling Yemeni strikes and that “everything is under control”—a narrative designed to deceive both its internal public and external backers. In reality, the fear gripping the occupiers, their lack of security, and the continuous siege they face due to Yemen’s decisions in response to the blockade of Gaza all tell another story. Economic deterioration, both at the state and individual level, continues to unfold beyond the ability of censorship and security repression to hide.

To this day, convoys of settlers continue to flee the occupied territories, escaping the worsening conditions inside the illegitimate entity since the al-Aqsa Flood operation. The heroic resistance operations, combined with the relentless strikes from the Resistance Axis, have shaken its stability. After 22 months of a brutal display of force—north and south—the outcome has been a collapse of Western confidence and that of international credit institutions in the viability of this entity’s future.

The Globes commentary came after an “Israeli” strike on Yemen and the swift Yemeni response that embarrassed and frightened both the Zionist entity and its U.S. backer. The confrontation with Yemen is becoming increasingly complex, dismantling the long-cultivated image of an “invincible” army, an “impenetrable” sky, and defenses capable of detecting even a mosquito. For decades, that image influenced Arab psychology by instilling fear and submission—but it now crumbles in real time.

In Washington, The Monitor magazine quoted a U.S. official stating that the Pentagon did not provide any intelligence or logistical support for the Zionist attack on the Haziz power plant. This withdrawal, the report explained, stems from Washington’s recognition that Yemeni forces now represent an exceptional case where numerical superiority no longer guarantees success. Instead, it is the efficient use of limited capabilities that sets Yemen apart. The official explicitly noted: “We do not want to give the Yemenis an excuse to abandon the ceasefire,” highlighting U.S. concerns that involvement would provoke Yemeni retaliation and collapse the fragile truce.

Thus, the Zionist entity opted to carry out its latest operation against Haziz using its navy. Yet, despite the futility of the strike, it further confirmed that Yemeni warnings had become a serious deterrent. Supreme Political Council President Mahdi al-Mashat openly warned that enemy aircraft would face consequences if they violated Yemeni airspace—a threat the Zionist entity appeared to take very seriously.

According to analysts, Yemen has successfully imposed caution on both American and Israeli forces through its tactical escalation, resilience, and consistency. Every time “Israel” attempts to match Yemen, it is forced into costlier options.

A recent report in the American journal The Maritime Executive highlighted that Yemeni air defenses deprived the enemy of one of its key advantages: the use of drones. It confirmed that Yemeni forces had downed several U.S. and Israeli drones across different regions, forcing the enemy to resort to more expensive and risky alternatives such as warplanes, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles. These methods carry heavy logistical burdens and direct risks to pilots. Military expert Brig. Gen. Abdul Ghani al-Zubaidi in Sana’a stated, “Yemen may well be the first Arab state to reach such an advanced level of air defense development.”

The continuation of Yemen’s painful strikes against the Zionist entity confirms several facts:

1. Yemen is a formidable adversary to all who violate the dignity and lives of the nation.

2. Enemy threats and attacks will not deter Yemen from its humanitarian and moral mission.

3. Yemen presents a living model of sincere faith and Islamic belonging that refuses to remain silent before the massacre of a Muslim people.

4. The myth of Zionist military superiority is collapsing.

Analysts agree that Yemen has created a decisive deterrence equation: it not only declared open confrontation with the Zionist entity but also besieged it—something no one dared to even speak of before. Importantly, the decision to halt operations rests with Yemen alone, not with the Zionist entity or its U.S. sponsor.

The broader conclusion among observers is that Yemen has become a difficult and complex factor in the region. The U.S., in turn, has chosen to step back from the naval confrontation to avoid humiliation. After 22 months of conflict, the lessons are clear: arrogance in dealing with Yemen has only led to failure, disgrace, and the exposure of the Zionist entity’s weaknesses.

Amid the growing despair at countering Yemen’s rising power—long conspired against for decades—the Zionist strikes on Yemen have become, in the words of observers, nothing more than “futile.” This has become an accepted reality even among the political and military elite inside the entity, whose analysts increasingly voice frustration over their army’s effectiveness against Yemen.

Some even sarcastically list Yemeni facilities repeatedly targeted by both the U.S. and “Israel,” including Hodeidah port facilities, Ras Kathib, and the Haziz and Dhahban power plants. Last week, the enemy’s Channel 14 mocked the attack on Haziz, dismissing it as a “pointless operation.”

Experts and analysts emphasize that this Yemeni superiority is exposed through the enemy’s repetition of failed tactics and its lack of strategy. The battlefield has revealed collapsing morale and a loss of initiative, leading the occupiers and their supporters to carry out meaningless attacks that they know, even before launching, will not alter Yemen’s capabilities or determination. Instead, these attacks serve only as an outlet for their frustration at persistent failure.