Yemeni Operations Shake Occupied Yaffa and Alarm Washington
Once again, Yemeni drones have successfully reached vital military and strategic targets in Ashkelon, and “Tel Aviv” occupied Yaffa as part of the ongoing fifth phase of escalation in support of Gaza and Lebanon. Despite extensive American efforts, fortified by divine protection, the United States has failed to weaken the Yemeni Armed Forces or prevent their continued operations. Similarly, there is no hope for the Zionists to ensure the safety of their infrastructure, settlers, or commercial shipping routes.
In the course of striking deep within occupied Palestinian territory, Yemen has expanded the battleground, significantly intensifying its attacks while overcoming enemy defensive belts over distances exceeding 2,000 kilometers. These strikes have shattered what the enemy considers “red lines,” hitting strategic targets in “Tel Aviv,” including the “Nahal Sorek” base, with precise weapons that have reached their designated objectives through Allah’s will.
The world has witnessed the inability of Zionist defense systems to counter Yemeni capabilities, particularly hypersonic missiles and drones. These persistent attacks have alarmed both the Americans and the Israelis, causing anxiety among the occupying forces. The invaders constantly brace themselves for the next siren blast, always on edge and ready to flee to shelters, day or night.
Enemy Forces Struggle as Settlers Live in Constant Fear
When viewed with realism and objectivity, even the enemy’s own reports, which often downplay the effectiveness of Yemeni strikes, reveal a dire reality. The interception of a few missiles or drones from Yemen, Lebanon, or Iraq over occupied Palestine does not end the threat or restore a sense of safety among the settlers. The economic imbalance is clear: a single Yemeni drone costing around $3,000 forces Israel to launch expensive interceptor missiles, depleting their strategic reserves. Furthermore, the collateral damage inflicted by these interceptions on Zionist settlements and infrastructure often surpasses the impact of the original drone attacks, as confirmed by video evidence and enemy admissions.
America Struggles Against the Currents of the Red Sea
Since Yemen declared a naval blockade on Zionist shipping routes and trade lines, maritime confrontations have intensified. Hardly a few days pass without an enemy vessel targeted under this blockade, either through missile strikes or drone attacks in the Indian Ocean, Arabian Sea, and Red Sea. Yemeni forces have demonstrated remarkable technological sophistication, using advanced surveillance and ship-tracking methods that have virtually eliminated the margin of error. These operations specifically target ships involved in the aggression against Gaza, disproving Washington’s claims of threats to global maritime trade.
Revealing Weaknesses in the U.S. Naval Fleet
Clear and undeniable evidence highlights America’s failure to neutralize Yemeni capabilities. This has forced the United States to either retreat from direct confrontations or resort to inciting internal conflicts and once again throwing terrorist designations. However, these measures have not and will not intimidate the Yemeni people.
In an interview with Al-Hurra, former CENTCOM deputy commander Mark Fox acknowledged that the U.S. continues to face challenges from what he called “Houthi” threats. He emphasized that Washington has not yet restored deterrence or met its strategic goals. Fox also suggested that maritime conflicts are more likely to be resolved on Yemen’s terms than under American directives.
Yemen’s preemptive attack on the aircraft carrier Abraham has further exposed vulnerabilities within the U.S. Navy, particularly after the Eisenhower’s failures in the Red Sea. The U.S. Naval Institute has admitted that these confrontations are extraordinarily difficult, with Yemeni ballistic missile strikes described as fearsome.
The White House’s concerns have only deepened as Yemeni operations against American warships continue to undermine the illusion of security felt by the American public. The notion that the United States can perpetually act as the world’s de facto police force is increasingly untenable, a reality underscored by The National Interest.