Ansarollah Website Official Report

The Yemeni scene today no longer requires any effort to distinguish the battle lines or exhaustive probing to uncover what lies beneath the surface. 

The picture recently drawn by the Hebrew press of the Saudi-Emirati conflict in the occupied provinces stands, in itself, as a damning historical indictment and a testimony “from within” that validates the foresight articulated by Sayyed Abdul-Malik Badr al-Din al-Houthi from the very first day of the aggression. 

At that moment, he placed all parties in their true proportions, describing those who rushed after the mirage of the coalition as mere “tools.” And when their functional utility expires, or when the interests of their regional patrons collide, they will turn on one another—leaving the “senior master” bewildered and exposed.

“Tools of Tools”… and a Confused Maestro

Today, Israeli elites are speaking with striking bluntness, reflecting a state of strategic disarray gripping decision-making circles in Tel Aviv. According to analyses published by Haaretz—particularly those put forward by analyst Zvi Bar’el—the long-standing theories of “alliances” and “axes” that Washington and the Zionist entity had banked on for years are collapsing in the face of realities forged daily by a Yemen steadfast in its faith and reliance on Allah.

The enemy entity, which over the past decade had pinned its hopes on a cohesive “Sunni axis” comprising Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and their local instruments—envisioned as a protective shield for its interests and a means to wage proxy wars on its behalf—now finds itself facing an existential dilemma: which tool should it back today? Riyadh, searching for a face-saving exit? Or Abu Dhabi, determined to press ahead with its fragmentation project?

This Israeli questioning, in itself, lays bare the true nature of the mercenaries inside Yemen. They were never carriers of a national project, nor genuine advocates of state restoration as they claim; rather, they are expendable pawns manipulated by “tools of tools.” When the Saudi sponsor clashes with the Emirati sponsor, mercenaries in Aden, Shabwa, and Al-Mahrah are automatically turned into fuel for this conflict—tossed about by the waves of clashing interests—while their Israeli patron watches the scene with mounting anxiety.

That anxiety—ironically—has nothing to do with Yemen’s stability or the blood of Yemenis. Instead, it stems from fear for the entity’s vital interests, which risk being undermined by the repercussions of this so-called “internal” infighting among its own clients.

Socotra: An Eye of the Enemy in Emirati Hands

Perhaps the most dangerous revelation contained in Zionist reports—particularly in the interview conducted by the JDN website with Yemeni affairs researcher Einav (Anbal) Nesim Lufton—is the naked truth that mercenary mouthpieces have long tried to conceal behind the sieve of so-called “legitimacy”: Israel’s alignment with the UAE in the Yemeni file is neither random nor coincidental.

Israeli testimonies point unambiguously to “close intelligence cooperation” on the island of Socotra, where “Israel”—with full Emirati funding and sponsorship—has installed advanced air-defense systems and sophisticated sensor equipment. The objective? To monitor Yemeni missiles and drones launched toward occupied Palestine.

Here, the scandal unfolds in its full dimensions, and betrayal reaches its peak. At a time when Sana’a is mobilizing all its military capabilities, rallying its people to strike deep inside the usurping entity, and waging a direct battle in the Red Sea on behalf of two billion Muslims, the so-called “Southern Transitional Council,” backed by the UAE, is busy turning Yemen’s strategic islands into rear protection bases for the Zionist entity.

This comes at a pivotal historical moment, recalling what had previously been laid bare: these forces did not arrive to restore a purported legitimacy so much as they were deployed to enable the occupier to dominate the fate of the Ummah. 

Now, Hebrew media removes all doubt, confirming that the UAE-aligned factions are the enemy entity’s “preferred option,” as they serve as the “trusted guardian” of its interests in the archipelago and maritime corridors—delivering a treacherous stab to the back of the Ummah and the Palestinian cause.

A Race to Court the Entity… Who Will Kneel First?

What is most disgraceful in this scene—and deeply nauseating to any free person—is the picture drawn by researcher Yoel Guzansky of Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies. 

He notes that the battle is not merely a Saudi-Emirati rivalry over influence in Yemeni geography, but rather a frenzied competition for “Israel’s favor.”

The Zionist researcher relays complaints from senior Emirati officials that Tel Aviv has begun prioritizing normalization with Saudi Arabia at the expense of deepening relations with Abu Dhabi. 

Conversely, Saudi officials voice resentment over the deep and privileged ties the entity has forged with the UAE in Yemen and across the region.

This rabid scramble to appease the Zionist enemy pushes Yemeni mercenaries to the very lowest depths of subservience and moral degradation. 

If their direct patrons—Riyadh and Abu Dhabi—are themselves jostling and elbowing one another to serve the Zionist project and reap its blessings, then where does that leave those fighting under their banners inside Yemen?

The old truth, renewed today, is that they are nothing more than “tools of tools of tools”—without a cause, without dignity, and without a future. 

They kill one another and fuel discord in the south, just as their counterparts do in Sudan and Somalia, for no purpose other than to enhance their patrons’ credentials before the American and Israeli masters, offering Yemen itself as a “sacrifice” on the altar of normalization.

The Fate of “Antoine Lahad” Awaits Them All

A careful reading between the lines of Hebrew media leads to an inevitable conclusion: the entity does not trust its agents, but exploits them until their usefulness is exhausted. 

Just as it previously abandoned the so-called “South Lebanon Army” and its agent Antoine Lahad, it now views Yemeni mercenaries as disposable paper tissues—used once and then discarded.

The Saudi-Emirati rift that unsettles the entity today may tomorrow end in a settlement or a withdrawal. When that happens, the mercenaries will find themselves exposed before the Yemeni people, having squandered their blood in the service of protecting Zionist navigation and showing desperate devotion to Zionist projects.

Sana’a: The Only Project of Sovereignty

Amid the chaos and disorientation consuming the other side, a clear and undeniable reality takes shape: Sana’a stands as the sole bearer of the comprehensive national and Arab project.

While the enemy entity laments and warns that divisions within the so-called “pragmatic camp” (Saudi Arabia and the UAE) harm its interests and threaten its national security, free Yemen stands as an impenetrable barrier—one that threatens the very existence of the entity itself and redefines the balance of power in the region.

The years—particularly the battle of “Al-Aqsa Flood” and the Yemeni support that followed—have proven that Sana’a’s decision is a purely sovereign one, rooted in the interests and creed of the Ummah. It is not dictated by an ambassador behind closed doors, nor controlled by a patron fearful of the White House’s wrath. The tightly imposed blockade on the enemy’s ports, the missiles striking the entity, and the operations encircling Umm al-Rashrash (Eilat) and rendering its ports idle constitute the practical response to all projects of normalization and subservience. As the Leader has stated, time reveals the truth—and today Hebrew media itself presents the conclusive evidence and clear proof of the correctness of this path:

• There is one side (Sana’a) being fought by the world, with its fleets and alliances, because it refuses to bow to “Israel” and insists on strangling its economy.

• And there are other sides (the mercenaries and their handlers) that clash among themselves, racing to demonstrate loyalty and obedience in pursuit of “Israel’s” approval.

Accordingly, today’s scene no longer tolerates neutrality or justification. One must either stand with Arab, faithful, strong, and dignified Yemen—closing the seas to the killers of women and children—or become a small, rusted cog in a vast Zionist machine, run by a Mossad intelligence officer, fueled by oil princes, and paid for by mercenaries with their blood and squandered dignity in battles that serve no cause of theirs—except fighting for the Zionist project, which will inevitably one day trample them, as is the fate of agents and the destiny of traitors throughout history.