Ansarollah Website Official Report
Published: Rabiʻ I 27, 1447 AH

The press is supposed to be the eye of truth and the tongue of conscience. Yet, under the kings of oil and sand, those media platforms become a dangerous instrument of deception — practically accomplices in the crime rather than mere conveyors of news. Saudi journalism is a glaring example: it insists on turning reality upside down, covering massacres with the veneer of misleading military terminology and providing the killer with a fresh pretext to continue his crimes.

The reality is clear: the Zionist entity is mustering three full military divisions, armed with tanks, aircraft, and shells, to grind the bones of children and women in Gaza’s streets, alleys, and beneath the rubble of its towers and residential buildings. But the Saudi press makes no mention of that. In one stark example, the Saudi Asharq Al-Awsat, published from London, deliberately portrays the aggression on Gaza as — in its words — an “attack on Hamas’s capital” against “2,500 fighters.” In doing so, the paper erases the idea of the forced displacement of more than a million Palestinians, ignores the blood of civilians, and replaces the image of a crime with that of an even contest between two armed parties — leaving the reader with the impression that what is happening is merely a military clash.

This description is by no means innocent; it is an intentional practice of deception — the vilest form of incitement and justification. On the one hand, it absolves the executioner of the blood of innocents; on the other, it converts the victim into the accused and prepares public opinion to accept, or even relish, the continuation of the massacre.

Moreover, when the paper refers to what it calls the “capital of Hamas,” it seeks to plant in the collective Arab consciousness the notion that this attack is “an assault on the last strongholds of Hamas,” that the resistance has been defeated. In military parlance, an assault on a “capital” implies that the attacker has prevailed and is near declaring victory — which has not happened and, by Allah's will, will not happen. Yet such framing — from a newspaper whose operators are presumed to be Arab Muslims — constitutes explicit support for the Zionist entity and a clear gloating at the possible defeat of the resistance.

More dangerous still, this media approach is not merely a deviation in professional conduct; it is an explicit expression of a political position: Riyadh is not with Gaza, not with the Palestinian cause, not even neutral. It is part of the conspiracy against the Palestinian people, by wrapping the occupier’s crimes in a discourse of “military legitimacy,” presenting them as a battle against a military or political faction rather than a campaign against an entire people — the primary victims being children and women.

Here, the press reveals more than it hides: it exposes the bias of its funders and lays bare the agendas that control its editorial line.

To the extent that Saudi media promotes justification for the Jewish crimes in Gaza, it also exposes the hypocrisy of the conspirators through pages funded by its government, Arab and Islamic money employed to serve agendas that contradict the spirit of Arabism and the essence of Islam. It is a press that speaks in a tongue not of the nation, working to manufacture a distorted consciousness that absolves the enemy and criminalizes the resistance — a scene that displays the degree of estrangement from the existential causes of the peoples.

Thus, it becomes clear that the danger threatening Palestine is not only the Israeli tanks nor the aircraft that rains shells from the sky, but the media platforms that turn massacres into “military reports,” offering the enemy free services in the field of consciousness that are no less dangerous than the services of collaborators on the battlefield. These media contributions run parallel to American support with weapons and deadly ammunition to achieve the same objectives and plans, of which the Kingdom is only one of the targets, and regrettably one of the tools, whether its rulers realize it or not.