The Zionist enemy carried out a fierce assault on the Yemeni capital Sana’a and Al-Jawf province, deploying more than ten fighter jets in what was ultimately a failed attempt to demonstrate military strength. Despite the extensive propaganda accompanying the raids, Yemeni air defenses managed to disrupt the operation, forcing part of the squadron to retreat from Yemeni airspace, leaving “Israel” unable to achieve its declared objectives.

Zionist-held media sought to portray the assault as a "military success" through inflated numbers and exaggerated claims. In reality, the strikes targeted civilian sites, including journalists and passersby, rather than legitimate military positions. Saudi Arabia’s “Al-Hadath” channel echoed this narrative, acting as a complementary Arab platform for Zionist propaganda and justifying its crimes.

The occupation entity launched long-range raids on Sana’a and Al-Jawf, claiming the involvement of “more than ten fighter jets,” the targeting of “15 sites with 30 munitions,” and strikes on what were described as “military camps, propaganda and public relations headquarters, and fuel depots.”

However, Yemeni air defenses undermined the operation by threatening several aircraft and forcing them to leave Yemen’s skies, meaning that fewer Zionist jets reached their intended targets than initially planned.

This aggression came amid ongoing Zionist escalation in response to recent Yemeni operations that, for three consecutive days, targeted "Ramon" and Lod airports, sensitive locations in occupied Quds, and "Dimona".

Over recent days, Zionist rhetoric has increasingly pointed toward an impending strike on Yemen, seeking to pressure Sana’a into halting its supportive front.

Zionist media focused on the alleged “military achievement,” highlighting the distance and duration of the mission, which it described as the "longest" since October 7, 2023. It emphasized the number of aircraft and munitions in an effort to project logistical and technological superiority.

Targets were repeatedly labeled as strictly military—“camps, launch platforms, propaganda/public relations headquarters, and fuel tanks for military use.” Such framing aimed to present the assault as a legitimate military accomplishment and justification for aggression.

In reality, however, no military facilities were hit. Instead, civilian sites, including the offices of 26 September and Al-Yemen newspapers, along with pedestrians in the streets, were attacked.

Some Zionist outlets went further, linking Yemen to so-called “existential chemical threats,” echoing recycled American narratives and the rhetoric of the media minister of the puppet government, who alleged Yemeni production of chemical and biological weapons. This mirrors the revival of “weapons of mass destruction” claims, once used to justify the invasion of Kuwait and pressure Syria’s national government.

The Zionist narrative relied heavily on technical bravado—numbers, distances, and munitions—while downplaying civilian losses by branding every civilian site as having “military uses,” even ordinary gas stations serving citizens daily.

Enemy media also crafted strong visuals: images of smoke plumes and fires, framed to suggest “precision” targeting of sensitive Yemeni capabilities, specifically defense, supply, and military media.

The assault carried both internal and external messages. Domestically, it sought to restore the image of deterrence. Regionally and internationally, it aimed to showcase the so-called “long arm” capable of striking “Israel’s enemies wherever they are,” including deep inside Yemen—tying this operation to previous strikes in Doha and Tunisia.

The Zionist military attempted to magnify the operation’s significance, stressing that the enemy’s Chief of Staff oversaw it from the “Kirya” headquarters in Tel Aviv and the Rabin Camp, underscoring the involvement of senior leadership in manufacturing and marketing a supposed deterrent action.

Military statements overloaded details—“15 targets, 30 munitions, 10 jets”—and categorized objectives to emphasize “precision” while downplaying Yemeni reports of civilian casualties.

This rhetoric sought to assert aerial and intelligence superiority, claiming the ability to penetrate deep targets in Sana’a and maintain a renewable “bank of targets.” Over the past days, Zionist officials have repeatedly highlighted alleged intelligence advances on the Yemeni front.

Yet, months of experience reveal the limited impact of such strikes on Yemen’s continued capacity to launch drones and missiles. The current campaign has had no direct effect on Yemeni support operations.

Criminal Netanyahu employed arrogant, escalatory language, seeking further confrontation. His attempted assassination of the Hamas delegation in Doha aimed to derail negotiations and reset talks to zero.

In the assault on Yemen, he sought to project a deterrence formula: “Whoever attacks us, we will reach them,” positioning it within a “multi-front war” linking Yemen, Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon, while exploiting the strike to project stability despite widespread domestic protests against him and his government.

Meanwhile, Zionist War "Minister" Yisrael Katz pushed the “long arm” slogan to reinforce this narrative.

Saudi Arabia’s Al-Hadath channel closely mirrored Zionist rhetoric, adopting its terminology and classifications. It broadcast minute-by-minute coverage of the assault, amplifying psychological warfare with urgent tickers describing air raids, government buildings allegedly bombed, and even sites not struck, such as the Saba News Agency.

On both television and social media, Al-Hadath published footage claiming strikes on the Ministries of Defense and Finance, as well as the Defense Complex in Al-‘Ardhi, transforming it into a direct Arab outlet for Zionist military propaganda.

On the humanitarian side, the channel highlighted casualties not to condemn crimes, but to emphasize the “power” of the enemy army, ultimately reinforcing the Zionist image of destruction and killing.

The Zionist message behind the bombardment of Sana’a was to reclaim deterrence through technical and logistical posturing, projecting a so-called “long arm” in the Yemeni arena. Unified political, military, and media narratives sought to legitimize aggression and crimes.

Following Yemeni strikes on enemy airports and sensitive sites in occupied al-Quds and "Dimona", the Zionist entity needed to demonstrate its ability to attack despite the multi-front attrition it faces. Yet, the ongoing Yemeni front exposes the falsity of this narrative.

Ultimately, the assault confirms the occupation’s failure to break Yemen’s deterrence equation. Its reliance on hollow propaganda merely masks its inability to counter Yemeni precision strikes that have reached deep into occupied Palestine. While the Zionist entity attempted to boast of its “long arm,” Sana’a has proven its own hand is longer, stronger, and steadfast in defending both Palestine and Yemen. With the Yemeni front persisting, enemy propaganda continues to collapse, revealing the reality of its crisis in a multi-front war where no true victory is within reach.