The aggressive coalition acquiescence to Sana’a conditions… How to interpret this?

In light of the political and military changes taking place in the Yemeni arena, with Sana’a insisting on its main demands to stop the war, lift the siege on Yemen and pay the salaries of all employees of the Republic of Yemen, it seems that any renewal of the UN armistice will go according to the conditions made by Sana’a. This will certainly result in significant implications and repercussions in the aspects of the battle that has been going on with the aggressive coalition forces for nearly eight years.

During the war years, Sana’a conducted the open battle with the forces of the Saudi-Emirati coalition with great skill. They focused on the direct military confrontation and the political negotiating tables extending from Kuwait to Stockholm to the recent UN armistice. Sana’a emerges victorious, while the coalition forces and their factions bear the defeats of war and politics together.

What is going on today behind the scenes of the coalition, with regard to the armistice, is nothing more than an attempt to beg Sana’a to get out of the Yemeni quagmire. This comes as there are desperate American and British attempts to pass the armistice, while maintaining the economic pressure card by continuing its war and siege on the Yemeni people. The aggression mistakenly believes it may achieve something at the negotiating table, but even the Zionist-American killing machine has failed to achieve this over the past years.

There is no doubt that the coalition forces’ acquiescence to the legitimate conditions of Sana’a paves the way for a new phase of the Yemeni file. A phase that may open the horizon for a final withdrawal of the coalition forces from Yemen without any new battle. It is obvious the UAE and the Saudi kingdom realize that Sana’a has become powerful. Today, Sana’a poses a real threat to great Western powers that support this coalition of aggression, so how can this mercenary coalition be able to improve their own security and stability?

But the question that arises here. Where is the position of the Presidential Council and the coalition factions in the negotiations taking place between Sana’a and the coalition countries. In addition, what is the future of these factions in the event of the resumption of the war or not?.. The answer is simple, stating that the presence of these factions no longer has any importance on the war scene and politics. This comes as Sana’a was able to transfer the battle to the depth of the lands of the aggression coalition, which imposed new rules of confrontation against Western powers that exceeded the imagination and size of the local tools.

Therefore, everything that is taking place in the southern governorates in the preset day, the struggles between the coalition parties and the desperate attempts to get rid of the mercenaries of this coalition, is a foregone conclusion. That is, to collect the failure of the factions in one place or rather under one framework to ensure one result, which is collective annihilation. This will remove them from the Political and military scene, which will become clear in the coming period when the coalition officially announces its abandonment of all those tools and factions.

In any case, it can be said that the recent events and developments regarding the Yemeni issue are preparing for the next stage, or rather for the stage of the coalition forces’ departure from Yemen. This can happen in two ways, either by the resumption of battles or the renewal of the international armistice for a fourth period. Under all cases, the data tends to Political and military interests are in favor of Sana’a, which is close to be victorious in the confrontation at all levels, according to observers.