Ansarollah Website Official Report
Published: 21 Dhu al-Qi'dah 1447 AH

The leader has repeatedly emphasized that the equation of domination the Zionist entity seeks to impose across the region will spare no one. The Israeli project is fundamentally expansionist, rooted in the beliefs of extremist ideologues and driven by a mentality shaped by historical obsessions and trauma, whenever this entity reaches the height of its power and arrogance, it ultimately collapses, leaving behind disappointment, regret, and remorse over the immense resources and efforts invested in its ambitions.

The Arab Republic of Egypt, a central and influential state in the region, is now considered by the Israeli enemy to be a vital strategic target. Egypt’s strength and regional stature, ensure that it remains permanently within Israeli calculations for a future moment deemed favorable for attacking it before moving on to other states. This is part of a broader project aimed at completing a tightening noose around the Arab and Islamic nations by the global Zionist movement.

The leader stated: “The Israeli enemy will one day move the battle to Egypt, as it has intentions to target Egypt, Jordan, and to complete the occupation of Syria.” He further stressed that “all countries in the region are targeted by the Zionist scheme that the Israeli enemy seeks to achieve,” adding that “the region will not achieve stability except through the defeat of the Zionist project, and this is what the nation must work toward.”

Egyptian Awareness of Enemy Plans

Against the backdrop of escalating regional tensions and the ongoing consequences of American and Israeli recklessness, signs of Israeli provocation toward Egypt have become increasingly visible. These developments are preparations for a potential military campaign aimed at weakening or overthrowing the Egyptian state and integrating it into what supporters of the Israeli expansionist vision refer to as “Greater Israel.”

Despite Zionist calculations, many believe that realities on the ground remain decisive. This is said to be reflected in the Egyptian public mood as well as among political and military elites, who are increasingly aware of Israeli intentions. At the same time, wider Arab and Islamic public opinion is recognizing that complacency and accommodation toward the Israeli entity—whether motivated by fear or political interests—will neither provide security nor preserve dignity and sovereignty. The current situation requires action to stop Israel’s growing disregard for international law and agreements in its treatment of regional states and peoples.

Enemy Hostility Toward the Egyptian Army

Recent Israeli rhetoric has highlighted a patronizing and arrogant approach toward Arab countries, including those that have normalized relations with the Israeli entity. This attitude becomes apparent whenever those states exercise sovereign rights within their own territories.

Last week, the ruling Zionist party within the occupying entity reportedly hinted at the possibility of military action against the Egyptian army, which is a symbol of national sovereignty and the country’s primary line of defense. The statements followed routine Egyptian military exercises conducted in Sinai between April 26 and April 30.

Amit Halevi, a member of the so-called Israeli Knesset, alleged that Egypt was “systematically” violating the decades-old peace agreement with the Israeli entity by constructing “combat infrastructure in Sinai” and building “a huge and modern army.” Halevi called on the Zionist "military" to “change its approach and deploy forces differently along the southern front” bordering Egypt. He also insisted that the Israeli entity should respond “firmly and with all available political tools” to any such Egyptian actions.

This intervention was reinforced by the so-called “Gaza Envelope Forum,” an organization representing settlers living near Gaza, which demanded that the "Israeli" government halt the Egyptian military drills, according to the Zionist channel “Israel 24.”

“Why Does Egypt Need Tanks?”

Developments over the past two years, particularly during the war in Gaza, have revealed increasingly aggressive Zionist political rhetoric directed at the Egyptian military presence in Sinai.

Zionist "Finance Minister" Bezalel Smotrich emerged as one of the leading voices articulating these concerns. In provocative and arrogant statements, Smotrich accused Egypt of “undermining Israel’s security,” remarks that Egypt’s Foreign Ministry rejected and called them as “crossing red lines.”

Earlier, at the end of January last year, the Zionist entity's permanent representative to the United Nations, Danny Danon, openly questioned Egypt’s military buildup. “They have no threats in the region,” he said. “Why do the Egyptians need all these submarines and tanks?”

Security Threats and a Powerful Army

In March 2025, further tensions exposed the fragility of the so-called peace treaty between Egypt and the Zionist entity. In this context, the so-called “normalization” agreements resemble deeds of ownership, enabling the entity to dictate terms to Arab states while denying them the right to object.

Last year, after Cairo demanded that Zionist forces withdraw from the Philadelphi Corridor along the border following its occupation by Zionsit enemy troops, strong reactions emerged from Zionist officials. Zionist War Minister "Yisrael Katz" invoked the peace treaty and attempted to rally international pressure against Egypt, declaring that "Israel" would not allow “violations of the peace agreement.”

On February 5, during a closed session of the so called "Knesset Foreign Affairs and Security Committee", War Criminal Netanyahu warned about the growing capabilities of the Egyptian army, explicitly calling for preventing what he termed an “excessive accumulation” of such capabilities.

Later, on February 26, Zionist Chief of Staff "Herzi Halevi" expressed concerns over what he called “the security threat from Egypt, which possesses a large army equipped with advanced military equipment.”

Netanyahu later raised the issue again during discussions with American Secretary of State Marco Rubio, reportedly alleging that Egypt was conducting military mobilizations and digging underground facilities for missile storage. However, Israeli sources told the BBC that there was “no evidence” confirming the presence of missiles in those underground sites. Such claims resemble the kind of rhetoric and political groundwork often seen prior to hostile actions against states and their populations. 

Contradictions and Extreme Double Standards

The hostile posture toward Egypt is another example of deception and manipulation embedded within Zionist political behavior. These interventions reinforce fears that Egypt itself may not be safe from future attempts at direct domination or infiltration. The increasingly aggressive discourse coming from the Israeli right wing is a part of a gradual process of preparation and conditioning for possible future moves whose circumstances may not yet be fully mature.

Yet, the most alarming aspect of these developments is the extent to which Israeli rhetoric reflects a desire for territorial possession and expansion. While Zionist officials accuse Egypt of violating the peace treaty merely for conducting routine military exercises on its own territory, those same officials openly promote maps and narratives connected to the concept of “Greater Israel.” In those instances, references to peace agreements disappear and are instead replaced by claims portraying expansionist ambitions as inevitable or even divinely sanctioned, as Netanyahu claimed.

Faced with these declared ambitions, Egyptians from across political and social sectors increasingly see themselves confronting overt threats to national sovereignty and fears of designs targeting Sinai. Egypt’s Democratic Generation Party stated that such Israeli boldness would not have been possible without the full support provided by American President Donald Trump to Netanyahu, which granted unprecedented political cover. The party also blamed accelerating Arab normalization with the Israeli enemy for encouraging Zionist leaders to publicly declare their expansionist aspirations and Zionist plans before the world.

Meanwhile, Egyptian politician Naji El-Shahabi stated that the continued relations maintained by some Gulf states and Morocco with the Israeli enemy despite these statements represent a painful failure toward the Arab and Islamic nation, allowing the Zionist entity to continue its plans without fear or deterrence.

Shift in Egyptian Discourse and the Return of the Word “Enemy”

As American-Israeli pressure and regional tensions intensify, threatening potentially catastrophic consequences for countries throughout the region, including Egypt, Egyptian official movements increasingly appear aimed at ending this situation while simultaneously raising military readiness to confront possible risks.

Egypt’s growing perception of the threat posed by the Israeli enemy has also contributed to a sharper tone in official Egyptian discourse regarding Israeli policies and actions, especially within the increasingly hostile behavior that no longer spares even states allied with the Israeli enemy through normalization agreements.

On September 16 of last year, Egypt warned in a Foreign Ministry statement that the region is standing “on the brink of a new phase of comprehensive chaos” due to “Israeli recklessness and increasing arrogance.” Egypt further expressed concern that Israeli aggressive policies were no longer confined to Gaza or the occupied West Bank, but were instead threatening the entire region.

During his speech at the Doha Summit, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el‑Sisi declared: “We must change our positions regarding the enemy’s perception of us, so that it understands that every Arab state extends from the ocean to the Gulf, and that its umbrella encompasses all Islamic states and all peace-loving nations.”

Sisi’s use of the word “enemy” attracted widespread attention. The term had largely disappeared from official Egyptian political language in reference to the Israeli entity since the signing of the peace treaty in 1979. Egyptian media quoted Diaa Rashwan, head of Egypt’s State Information Service, as saying: “For the first time, the word has been spoken by a President of the Arab Republic of Egypt since President Sadat announced that he would go to al-Quds, and it had never been repeated afterward.”