Ansaorllah Website. Report

May 6, 2025, will remain a dark day for the United States. On that day, its barbaric and aggressive course began to unravel, and its record began to document strategic setbacks unprecedented in their severity. As a result, the world's perception of the "invincible power" shifted to that of a nation susceptible to manipulation and subjugation. Its terrorist aura and the swagger of its hegemony began to fade, along with the deterrent equation it had acquired through its deviant behavior during World War II.

On this date, May 6, 2025, the entire world was stunned by the decision of the terrorist "Trump" to withdraw from confronting the Yemeni armed forces in the Red Sea. The impact of this event prompted many around the world to reconsider their reliance on American power. The circumstances—including the unlimited mobilization and deployment of military capabilities to carry out an urgent rescue mission for the entity from the "Yemeni threat"—gave an advantage to this emerging power with limited resources.

With premeditation and planning:

attention and surveillance cameras turned to a significant mobilization of American forces, including destroyers and aircraft carriers, and their deployment to the region to carry out an aggressive operation against Yemen. This revealed—in one of the first indications—that the decision to launch the aggression was not accidental, but rather premeditated and planned. The criminal Trump had initiated this process before returning to the White House, explicitly affirming the necessity of eliminating the Yemeni threat to the entity.

At that time, the barbaric Israeli aggression against Gaza was at its peak, while the stages of its punishment by the Yemeni forces were writing new transformations that the world had never witnessed before in an absolute way. The ballistic, hypersonic, fragmentation missiles and drones showed the enemy as it is in its nature without embellishment and without media exaggeration, and turned the lives of the Zionists into a repeated “marathon” race to escape from the bombing to the shelters, and complicated the living capabilities of many of the usurpers after a siege whose echoes reached all the world to the port of Umm al-Rashrash, and forced companies to cut off their investment with the Israeli enemy, and turned the entity into an unsafe geography.

The confrontation shatters the American bets

The aggressor, clinging to the illusion that everything would return to normal, proceeded with the Zionist enlistment on the path of implementing the plan to entrench its dominance and create the conditions for the emergence of what is called "Greater Israel." He and his extremist leaders in the White House and the Pentagon wagered on intimidation, given America's status as the world's leading power and its immense influence over nations, both ruling regimes and opposition forces. They also wagered—to achieve an easy victory—on the long-held perception that Yemen is a weak state, ravaged by wars and conflicts, its resources devoured, unable to recover and build its capabilities, especially after enduring eight continuous years of aggression that destroyed everything, and a blockade that plunged the country into a spiral of crises.

These very details led the international community to side with the "superpower," preemptively concluding that the conflict was unequal and therefore the outcome was predetermined in favor of the American bully. That is why the criminal’s announcement of withdrawal came as a thunderbolt; this unexpected result and ill-considered escape confused the accumulated perceptions about the nature of the rules of power after decades of limiting them to the level and size of military capabilities, and demolished the concepts of deterrence that had long misled the world and created for America an aura that made it a country capable of doing anything.

Imposing New Equations

Just as the decision to attack the Yemenis was made only after careful planning and preparation, the decision to withdraw came after the reverberations of Yemeni strikes jolted the arrogant American from its state of delusion. He witnessed the attacks targeting his naval fleets, downing his fighter jets and spy drones, shattering the prestige of his aircraft carriers, and simultaneously striking deep into the heart of the Israeli entity and imposing a blockade upon it. Admiral Kevin Kidd Donegan, former commander of the US Fifth Fleet, stated: "The Yemenis shot down numerous American Reaper drones, and they have gained a prominent position within the axis of resistance, increasing their capacity to manufacture weapons in Yemen. The Yemenis are the ones who made us witness the first space war ever."

In the details of the battle and its outcome, Yemen established an exceptional presence, elevating it to a level of formidable power capable of influencing events after successfully imposing new equations. Some considered these equations to be shifts in the pattern of naval operations unseen since World War II. The outcome was far beyond the comprehension of observers and those deluded by America's power. America withdrew on Yemeni terms, and Yemen, in an agreement to end the confrontation, granted the American enemy an opportunity to regroup and cease playing the role of defender of the Zionist entity, in exchange for Yemen continuing its support operations for Gaza.

This event represented a slap in the face to the Israeli enemy, which had expressed its desire for the agreement to include a clause prohibiting Yemen from targeting its entity. However, America was in no position to impose such a condition, leaving the entity facing exposure and diminishment of its capabilities, an inability to guarantee the protection of its settler society, and a heightened sense of existential threat.

A Severe Loss of Capabilities and Reputation

Observers assert that Washington believed its massive mobilization—deploying six aircraft carriers and destroyers—would be sufficient to deter Yemen and force it to halt attacks on the occupying entity and lift the blockade. However, the Yemeni forces delivered a surprise that had been building for over 50 days of confrontation, establishing new realities, most notably the end of the era of relying on the deterrent power that aircraft carriers had enjoyed for decades. What Washington attempted to use as tools of intimidation and coercion became targets for the Yemeni forces.

Many American leaders—including current and former military personnel—acknowledge that US forces experienced a difficult period during the confrontation with Yemen in the Red Sea, suffering a severe loss of capabilities and reputation. They describe what happened as a defeat, even if Washington hasn't explicitly declared it. Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson confirms that there is no other explanation for what happened than a defeat for the United States at the hands of the Yemeni forces.

Johnson also asserted that Yemeni operations in the Red Sea have imposed a new reality on Western powers, demonstrating the failure of Washington and its allies to protect the shipping lanes they have claimed to control for decades. He noted that Yemeni capabilities have shifted the balance of naval power in the region. Meanwhile, observers acknowledge that Yemen's demonstrated ability to assert its sovereignty and its steadfast support for the Palestinian cause were not only behind Trump's decision to withdraw from the war, but also prompted him to agree to a ceasefire in Gaza.